I can hardly believe that Monday is already here again. As with most anything in my life these days, the time has flown by and it feels like only yesterday that my blogging endeavor began. Perhaps that's because I enjoy it so much. Where else can I go to dump my thoughts, all for my own amusement, with absolutely no regard for spelling or punctuation? I'd have to say the one aspect of blogging I find most pleasurable is how it allows me to write whatever the heck I want to write. And after spending both Saturday and Sunday stealing smidgeons of time to do revisions on a manuscript I'd set aside to rest, I've decided to address a subject that I find kinda ugly but inescapable nonetheless.
As I worked on corrections this weekend, I began to see a major flaw developing within the very premise of my book. Something really bad, and as a reader something quite unforgivable.
You see, as a reader, there are certain mistakes in other's writing that I let slide: spelling errors, grammatical uh-oh's, a clumsy sentence here or there. However, when it comes to character development, I'm somewhat of a stickler. There's something about witnessing the progression of a character, watching them grow, unfurl their wings and eventually fly, that I find to be absolutely satisfying. That's probably the reason I prefer to read a series in lieu of a stand alone novel, any day. Over the course of a series I can really get in there and grow to love the protagonist. Personally, as a reader, this is what makes me come back for more, this is what makes me buy the next book, and the next. But when that character, the one I'm invested in-- the one I know inside and out, does something out of character or makes a decision that makes no bloody sense, I find my interest waning. Every single time.
I've found this within many bodies of work. One example that comes to mind is the
Evermore series by Alyson Noel. First of all, I just want to say that this in no way is a knock on Ms. Noel's writing ability, style, or creativity. I am not critiquing her with my writers hat on, I'm simply looking at this from my own personal point of view as a reader, and she just happens to be the one who came to mind. (BTW: I must warn that if you haven't read the Immortal series and plan to, this contains spoilers!)
From the very first line I was hooked. I found myself intrigued by the heroine, Ever, and by the enigmatic Damen. I adored the idea of immortals and past lives, and as the story continued, I found myself swept up into it. I finished Evermore and without hesitation, I purchased the second book, Blue Moon, and then the third, Shadowland. But that's where it ended for me.
Ever, Noel's protagonist, made a decision that didn't jive. I didn't buy it.
Before I go any further I want to make it clear that although a certain character I'm about to discuss, annoyed me, that wasn't the actual reason for the disconnect. All along my reading career I've had the opportunity to meet many characters that have irked me, but that's just part of the fun. Usually.
In this case, I find it hard to believe that Noel ever intended for the reader (me) to foster such a strong dislike for this character.
Haven, Ever's cupcake eating, selfish best friend. She lacked even one redeemable quality. I couldn't stand her. With a best friend like that, who needs enemies? I practically did a little jig when it looked like Noel was going to give her the axe. YES! YES! please put me out of my misery and kill the chick off. Everyone would win: Ever and Damen could actually touch each other again, a change that needed to take place anyway, since the idea was growing old (besides, it's nice to be able to hold hands with your boyfriend without the need for mittens or a strange layer of energy), Haven would move along, never to be heard from again (hallelujah), and Roman would have to reassess his strategy--he seems awfully resourceful to me, I'm sure he'd come up with something.
But best of all, if Ever had simply allowed Haven to die, her decision would have been viewed as noble. Ever would have remained in character while managing to save her best friend from the chance of going to that dark hell--you know-- the one guaranteed to any immortal who has the unfortunate incident of getting struck right in their sensitive chakra.
I just didn't get it.
Why? Why would Ever give Haven the elixir that would turn her immortal? It makes me question Ever, I thought she cared about Haven (although I'm at a loss to know why). And here I was under the impression that Haven was the selfish one...
So here's the deal. One of two things might have changed this for me: 1) If Haven had been remotely likable,
maybe then I could have sympathized with Ever's choice, or 2) If Ever already had the tendency to make stupid decisions. But she wasn't the stupid type--young and foolish, yes--stupid, no.
I'm sure I must have some sort of weird glitch in my brain. That for most this wasn't an issue, and that those lucky readers went on to find the fourth book a treat. But try as I might, I couldn't get past it. Now the actual premise itself, the bones of the story, did nothing but irritate me. I kept imagining how things could have gone. How Ever and Damen's relationship would have deepened, but with Roman constantly in the way, their love affair remaining just out of reach, never fully fulfilled. How Ever's decision to allow Haven to die startles Roman, upping the ante. How this time it will be different--after all, Ever was never immortal in those past lives, things
should be different. This time she's changed and won't fall for the same crap. Although, this is probably what happens by the fifth book. But I'll never know. Because I can't bring myself to read it. Ugh.... so frustrating...
So this brings me back to my own writing and my own problem, and the fact that I better get off of here and onto repairing my mess. If I don't fix it, no one will want to read it. And aren't readers what this is all about anyway? Tootles!